The Student Rights Committee voted against legislation last night that would have disbanded the Student Senate Court of Appeals.
No members have direct relations to the Senate
The bill, which was proposed by Student Body President Michael Wade Smith and Senior Sen. Mark Pacey, would have restored judicial authority to the Student Executive Committee.
Smith said the Student Executive Committee’s makeup gives it a “deep and intimate knowledge of the rules and regulations because we created them.”
Opponents feared that if judicial power were restored to the Student Executive Committee and an issue were to arise against members of the executive staff, theoretically they could vote on it or even influence other voting members because of their position.
Felix Zacharias, a first-year graduate student from Wichita, prepared a negative speech to be read to committee members at the meeting because he could not be present.
In his statement, Zacharias said disbanding the court of appeals would be “unethical, unwise and undemocratic.”
In 2009 when Student Body president Adam McGonigle suspended treasurer Alex Porte, a quick-fix solution wasn’t readily available and resulted in the birth of the court of appeals. Non-traditional student senator Aaron Harris, a senior from Wyandotte and a photographer for The University Daily Kansan, said he had multiple concerns with giving the judicial authority back to the committee.
“I believe the court of appeals is a new body that has not been given the chance to evolve into what the designers wanted it to be,” Harris said.
The remaining Student Senate committee meetings of the semester will deal with nominations for upcoming Senate elections.